:P
yeah that’s too much work
:<W>P Markdown is love. <3 The w is there because it’s easy to reach, and it’s capitalized because letting go of shift is too much of a bother.
What is <W> for?
also, random stuff here because discourse limits
What, you don’t like the cracked out emoticons?!
Why would anyone? 
2 Likes
Actually, those look really nice. I’d prefer those over what we have now… but I’ll always prefer plain text emoticons ;P
Also, thanks for this:
I’ll use that often :D
1 Like
Probably a noob question, but how does your Discourse look like that? I don’t have a toolbar, only a list button for navigation in the top right…
That looks like an administration panel to me.
1 Like
That’s the admin panel for the test forums that @riking allowed me to use to create the forum theme. :) I figured I’d take a peek where I could to see if it was possible.
I never had a problem with emoticons… c^:
3 Likes
Looks great to me. I prefer that over the current design by a lot!
that creates an empty markdown tab. but because it’s not really markdown, it doesn’t register as anything. To the emoji replacer, though, :<W>) doesn’t equal anything, since it was looking for :), and ends up creating :) ← that.
What no? Emojis are amazing. 
Yeah, but :) is definitely happier than 
:D, which makes no sense… and 
just looks semi-evil…
Emoticons give the forums character ;3
1 Like
Ha.
Ha.
Haaaaahh…
yeah I don’t like them very much, can you tell? 
1 Like
You can always sterilize your text, but putting a \ before every potential control character.
eg. 
* is this \:\) \;\) \* without the \'s it looks like this: •
I didn’t think much of the different look at first because of a stylesheet override I’m using (via Stylebot), courtesy of @octoshrimpy’s post here.
Which looks quite nice. Kudos, Shrimpy!
1 Like